tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5512311610334754148.post1237526516226549887..comments2023-04-20T12:46:11.858-06:00Comments on The Ancestry Insider: Partnership Town Hall with FamilySearch Executives: Partnerships (#RootsTech #RTATEAM)The Ancestry Insiderhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02490682912125335188noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5512311610334754148.post-39090116132908022062015-03-05T17:43:24.362-07:002015-03-05T17:43:24.362-07:00As you said you did the best you could with your n...As you said you did the best you could with your notes, so perhaps I am misunderstanding the implications of your post, are they considering allowing people to upload entire Gedcom files or family trees to FamilySearch Family Tree? I am opposed to that. That would just increase the duplications and erroneous relationships in Family Tree.<br /><br />Even in obscure families like mine, there are multiple duplicates of the people in Family Tree caused by the entry of persons names from many of the records that have been indexed. It appears for people in the United States that were born in the very early 20th century and before they already have multiple profiles in Family Tree.<br /><br />Please let me know if this is under consideration.<br /><br />To enter a profile in Family Tree it should be checked against the individuals in Family Tree before it is allowed to be entered.<br /><br />Uploading entire Gedcom files or family trees to FamilySearch Family Tree, without checking each person one at a time against the persons in FamilySearch Family Tree, say it isn't so!Richttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06749020915572612354noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5512311610334754148.post-45007327539386505382015-03-04T09:52:29.978-07:002015-03-04T09:52:29.978-07:00Synching various internet trees with FS-Family Tre...Synching various internet trees with FS-Family Tree is as bad an idea as was the way new.FamilySearch was created (composites of largely erroneous submitter data).<br /><br />This will make FS-FT a monster swamp. In the present state of synching with Ancestry.com trees, a statement saying the "reason" for a person's data was correlated with Ancestry.com **erases** a fact-based reason for the same datum that had been submitted by a different user. A host of LDS members appear, very mistakenly, to believe that "I got it from Ancestry.com" is a valid reason statement. This should stop immediately.<br />Geoloverhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12050268303916428230noreply@blogger.com