tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5512311610334754148.post8390159914796332887..comments2023-04-20T12:46:11.858-06:00Comments on The Ancestry Insider: FamilySearch Announces Shutdown, UpgradeThe Ancestry Insiderhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02490682912125335188noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5512311610334754148.post-52716483483227955642016-06-23T20:48:57.241-06:002016-06-23T20:48:57.241-06:00I heard today that the note limit has been raised ...I heard today that the note limit has been raised to 50.Nathan Murphyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16335989842820672777noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5512311610334754148.post-76399434648957358852016-06-23T10:12:24.214-06:002016-06-23T10:12:24.214-06:00Family search does not contain private trees, and ...Family search does not contain private trees, and since there are hundreds of other people who are the descendent sod your ancestors, your ancestors may already be on the tree. Also, living people, who are LDS, cannot be viewed by others, unless they are direct ancestors or children of the person looking at the tree. So if you have an account and log on, you could not see your living siblings, cousins, aunts and uncles, even if they are LDS and are in the system. Lisa And Randyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07232186814406464470noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5512311610334754148.post-69274737570523808832016-06-21T12:03:45.134-06:002016-06-21T12:03:45.134-06:00yea still not putting my tree on it. "if a ...yea still not putting my tree on it. "if a person is linked to an LDS Church Membership record, that person can not be merged into another person, although the reverse (merging a person into the person linked to the membership record) is possible." really make it possible one directing but not the other. so if my sister is LDS and I am not THERE is no way to link us unless I do it. NOPE not good news at all leave well enough alone, still not putting my tree on FS OR FT. Norsk Reisehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02353153281535123248noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5512311610334754148.post-77572149871834047462016-06-21T10:01:31.500-06:002016-06-21T10:01:31.500-06:00You were right. This is very good news. https://ge...You were right. This is very good news. https://getsatisfaction.com/familysearch/topics/preparing-to-stop-synchronizing-between-nfs-and-familytree-on-betaJustinhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07200545553879406470noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5512311610334754148.post-53423971113375404572016-06-21T09:50:06.820-06:002016-06-21T09:50:06.820-06:00James Tanner also believed the purpose of the main...James Tanner also believed the purpose of the maintenance was to separate Family Tree from NFS. I thought the maintenance was just to change over to the new database sometimes referred to as Tree Foundation. Is it both? Tree Foundation would be a great time to kill NFS but I've never heard anyone from FamilySearch intimate that it was going to happen.Justinhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07200545553879406470noreply@blogger.com