tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5512311610334754148.post975315476187655645..comments2023-04-20T12:46:11.858-06:00Comments on The Ancestry Insider: Other Employee Bloggers at FamilySearchThe Ancestry Insiderhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02490682912125335188noreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5512311610334754148.post-761853578861908412009-06-12T18:18:44.290-06:002009-06-12T18:18:44.290-06:00If anyone uses Footnote.com's search, then the...If anyone uses Footnote.com's search, then they understand the frustrating nature of a search with only one field. So much data, but almost no way to find anything.Nickhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10365249561989106035noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5512311610334754148.post-32252228932373379802009-06-11T21:35:31.035-06:002009-06-11T21:35:31.035-06:00Dear Lynn,
You're my favorite! Buena suerte!!...Dear Lynn,<br /><br />You're my favorite! Buena suerte!! Esta chevere!!<br /><br />-- La Ascendencia ColaboradorThe Ancestry Insiderhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02490682912125335188noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5512311610334754148.post-45357184375369205952009-06-11T21:27:38.549-06:002009-06-11T21:27:38.549-06:00But how can we ordinary people know how well the G...But how can we ordinary people know how well the Google search process works? If we don't find anything, was it because the search was ineffective, or is it because there was nothing out there on the internet to be found?just-commentinghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13787703966793845788noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5512311610334754148.post-48674742239266916322009-06-11T21:20:40.150-06:002009-06-11T21:20:40.150-06:00Dear Dan,
You're my favorite! Thank you for t...Dear Dan,<br /><br />You're my favorite! Thank you for talking sense into the issue (and me).<br /><br />Look for more of my thoughts on this issue next week.<br /><br />-- The Ancestry InsiderThe Ancestry Insiderhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02490682912125335188noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5512311610334754148.post-63259417239606533262009-06-11T19:01:15.421-06:002009-06-11T19:01:15.421-06:00The secret is out if the Ancestry Insider is menti...The secret is out if the Ancestry Insider is mentioning my blog :) Hope you find my blog useful, interesting, and informative...get ready for a Hispanic genealogy explosion on the internet over the next couple of years - don't say I didn't warn you!<br /><br />-LynnLynn Turner, AGhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14491729340562410176noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5512311610334754148.post-66755715396684008742009-06-11T09:44:08.182-06:002009-06-11T09:44:08.182-06:00Before anyone gets too excited let's be very c...Before anyone gets too excited let's be very clear, FamilySearch Product Managers have not suggested that Google is good at searching genealogical data. They have correctly (in my opinion) understood that Google has trained the masses to use a single field for search. The logic then follows that if (and only if) the engineering challenges of using a single field search for genealogy could be 'trained' to provide similar or better quality of search results as the current search templates do, then those that are new to genealogy may more quickly be productive if they are able to use their current search paradigm and the system is intelligent enough to adapt it to the domain of genealogy.Dan Lawyerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16347716558962775435noreply@blogger.com