Tuesday, June 10, 2008

FamilySearch Update: 1850 U.S. Census (Select States), Czech Republic, and Philadelphia Marriages

FamilySearch issued this press release this morning:


FamilySearch Update
10 June 2008

The FamilySearch Record Search pilot has just added 3.1 million records from the 1850 U.S. Census for the states of Maine, New Jersey, and Ohio. An additional 117,000 unindexed digital images were added for Philadelphia marriages and Czech Republic church books.

These collections can be searched for free at http://pilot.familysearch.org. The Record Search pilot is testing a new online digital image viewer and search capability that will be added to FamilySearch.org in the near future.

Project Title

Indexed Names

Records

Unindexed Images

Comments

Pennsylvania, Philadelphia Marriage Indexes

 

 

25,846

New

Czech Republic, Litomerice Regional Archive Church Books

 

 

92,001

Images added

1850 United States Census
(ME, NJ, OH)

 

3,179,432

 

Updated with add'l data

Sunday, June 8, 2008

NFS Update for 8-June-2008

Two months until 08/08/08 and the Olympics. It's been a couple of weeks since I've updated the map, and there have been lots of changes.

New FamilySearch Rollout Map for 10-Jun-2008

Besides the changes mentioned in my last map-less update, here's what's new:

  • As expected, these temple districts went live last week: Accra Ghana, Curitiba Brazil, São Paulo Brazil and Vera Cruz México.
  • This week we're expecting the activation of Madrid Spain, Nashville Tennessee and San Jose Costa Rica. At present, we're only one away from 50 districts on NFS, so we'll break that milestone this week! The map shows Madrid and Costa Rica going live, but I forgot Nashville. (Sorry!)
  • These districts have recently received notification:
    Atlanta Georgia
    Preston England
    Raleigh North Carolina
    Seattle Washington
    Washington, D.C.
  • I've added a legend to the map, rather than depending on explaining the colors in the adjoining text, as suggested by a reader. (Thanks!)

Remember that Temple Districts Using New FamilySearch is updated several times a week, as I hear from consultants receiving notifications. Keep me informed and I'll keep you informed. AncestryInsider@gmail.com

Thursday, June 5, 2008

FamilySearch Indexing Tip: Handwriting Help

I keep meaning to look up all those handwriting resources on the Internet and really learning to read the old-style cursive. But almost always a simple, tried-and-true approach gets me by. This will be old-news to all but the newest of indexers. But this is such a gem for all you new and prospective indexers, it's well worth covering here.

When you can't read a letter, find it in a word you can read.

Simple. Powerful.

Let's look at some examples. Let's imagine you're new to cursive and you don't recognize the middle initial in the name below. Is it C? L? Q? A? G? L? B? You experienced indexers laugh. You have no idea how hard cursive has been for me! I panic and suddenly any weird letter seems possible. Then I remember my method and start looking for the same letter elsewhere. Obviously, Justin's profession, "Clothing dealer," begins with the same letter. The middle initial is a C.

The middle initial C can be verified by comparison to the word  
The middle initial C can be verified by comparison to the word "Clothing."

Let's look at more examples. In the illustration below, I had a hard time with Anna middle initial. Can you find it used somewhere else? What about the middle initials of the last Sarah?

Which of the middle initials in this illustration also appear elsewhere?
Which of the middle initials in this illustration also appear elsewhere?

You should have found Anna's middle initial, I, also appears in the name Isabelle. Sarah has two initials. You should have found the second initial, L, in Lucas, even though the writer's pen didn't complete the bottom stroke of the L. The first initial, A, is a little tougher, since it looks different in Anna. This happens sometimes when a capital letter appears by itself. Hopefully, though, you could see the correspondence.

When looking for a matching letter, don't forget to look at words other than names, as we saw in the first example. And don't forget that many census projects include a previous page that may contain the letter you're looking for.

Remember. When you can't read a letter, find it in a word that you can read.

Wednesday, June 4, 2008

New records added to FamilySearch record search

FamilySearch released this press announcement this morning.

FamilySearch Update

FamilySearch added 24 million new names from England baptism and marriage records to its pilot Record Search collection. The collection can be accessed for free at http://pilot.familysearch.org. The Record Search pilot is testing a new online digital image viewer and search utilities that will be added to FamilySearch.org in the near future.

Project Title

Indexed Names

Records

Unindexed Images

Comments

England Baptisms

19,032,103

6,798,235

0

New

England Marriages

4,924,366

1,787,802

0

New

Tuesday, June 3, 2008

Ancestry Boosts Newspaper Collection

Those who regularly check the Recent Databases widget on the Ancestry Insider website have known since last Friday that Ancestry posted a slew of new newspaper content. At the time I'm writing this, there has not yet been an official mention by Ancestry.

That we should anticipate a large newspaper release was recently mentioned by Ancestry.com CEO, Tim Sullivan, and announced by Ancestry VP of Content, Gary Gibbs. If my count is correct, there were 240+ new or updated titles posted Friday. I guess we'll have to wait for official word to know if this completes the release mentioned.

The newly posted or updated titles are:

Playground Daily News (Fort Walton Beach, Florida) 05/30/2008
Troy Record (Troy, New York) - Updated 05/30/2008
The Argus (Fremont, California) - Updated 05/30/2008
Times Record (Troy, New York) - Updated 05/30/2008
Portsmouth Herald (Portsmouth, New Hampshire) - Updated 05/30/2008
Kokomo Tribune (Kokomo, Indiana) - Updated 05/30/2008
Mexia Evening Ledger (Mexia, Texas) - Updated 05/30/2008
North Adams Transcript (North Adams, Massachusetts) - Updated 05/30/2008
Berkshire Eagle (Pittsfield, Massachusetts) - Updated 05/30/2008
Newport Daily News (Newport, Rhode Island) - Updated 05/30/2008
The High Point Enterprise (High Point, North Carolina) - Updated 05/30/2008
The Bismarck Tribune (Bismarck, North Dakota) - Updated 05/30/2008
The Pointer (Riverdale, Illinois) - Updated 05/30/2008
News Journal (Chicago, Illinois) - Updated 05/30/2008
Encyclopedia of Virginia Biography, Vol. IV 05/30/2008
Encyclopedia of Virginia Biography, Vol. V 05/30/2008
English Duplicates of Lost Virginia Records 05/30/2008
New South Wales, Australia, Assisted Immigrant Passenger Lists, 1828-1896 05/30/2008
New South Wales, Australia, Unassisted Immigrant Passenger Lists, 1826-1922 05/30/2008
Taglicher Volksfreund (Milwaukee, Wisconsin) - Updated 05/30/2008
The Kingsport Times (Kingsport, Tennessee) - Updated 05/30/2008
Port Arthur News (Port Arthur, Texas) - Updated 05/30/2008
Nashua Telegraph (Nashua, New Hampshire) - Updated 05/30/2008
Ironwood Daily Globe (Ironwood, Michigan) 05/30/2008
Hammond Times (Hammond, Indiana) 05/30/2008
The Vidette Messenger (Valparaiso, Indiana) 05/30/2008
Anderson Herald (Anderson, Indiana) 05/30/2008
Beckley Post-Herald (Beckley, West Virginia) 05/30/2008
Tri City Herald (Pasco, Washington) - Updated 05/30/2008
The Bee (Danville, Virginia) - Updated 05/30/2008
Suburbanite Economist (Chicago, Illinois) - Updated 05/30/2008
Mason City Globe Gazette (Mason City, Iowa) - Updated 05/30/2008
The Piqua Daily Call (Piqua, Ohio) - Updated 05/30/2008
Modesto Evening News (Modesto, California) - Updated 05/30/2008
Fitchburg Sentinel (Fitchburg, Massachusetts) - Updated 05/30/2008
Barnard Bulletin (New York, New York) - Updated 05/30/2008
Daily Republican News (Hamilton, Ohio) - Updated 05/30/2008
Courier News (Blytheville, Arkansas) 05/30/2008
Northwest Arkansas Times (Fayetteville, Arkansas) 05/30/2008
Abilene Morning Reporter-News (Abilene, Texas) 05/30/2008
Amarillo Daily News (Amarillo, Texas) 05/30/2008
Amarillo Globe (Amarillo, Texas) 05/30/2008
Robesonian (Lumberton, North Carolina) 05/30/2008
Butler County Democrat (Hamilton, Ohio) 05/30/2008
Hamilton Daily News Journal (Hamilton, Ohio) 05/30/2008
Weirton Daily Times (Weirton, West Virginia) 05/30/2008
Berlin City Courant (Berlin, Wisconsin) 05/30/2008
Chilton Times (Chilton, Wisconsin) 05/30/2008
Daily Telegram (Eau Claire, Wisconsin) 05/30/2008
Eau Claire Leader (Eau Claire, Wisconsin) 05/30/2008
Nord Stern (La Crosse, Wisconsin) 05/30/2008
Der Nord-Westen (Manitowoc, Wisconsin) 05/30/2008
Atlas Tagliche Ausgabe (Milwaukee, Wisconsin) 05/30/2008
Banner Und Volksfreund Vereinigte Tagliche Stadt-A (Milwaukee, Wisconsin) 05/30/2008
Das Tagliche Banner (Milwaukee, Wisconsin) 05/30/2008
Oneonta Star (Oneonta, New York) 05/30/2008
Ada Weekly News (Ada, Oklahoma) 05/30/2008
Sunday Gazette-Mail (Charleston, West Virginia) 05/30/2008
Fresno Bee Republican (Fresno, California) 05/30/2008
Naples Daily News (Naples, Florida) 05/30/2008
Panama City News (Panama City, Florida) 05/30/2008
Panama City News-Herald (Panama City, Florida) 05/30/2008
Idaho Free Press (Nampa, Idaho) 05/30/2008
Oil City Derrick (Oil City, Pennsylvania) 05/30/2008
McKean County Miner (Smethport, Pennsylvania) 05/30/2008
Hamilton Daily News (Hamilton, Ohio) 05/30/2008
Hamilton Evening Journal (Hamilton, Ohio) 05/30/2008
Journal News (Hamilton, Ohio) 05/30/2008
Evening Independent (Massillon, Ohio) 05/30/2008
Corpus Christi Caller (Corpus Christi, Texas) 05/30/2008
Corpus Christi Caller-Times (Corpus Christi, Texas) 05/30/2008
Lawton Constitution And Morning Press (Lawton, Oklahoma) 05/30/2008
Bridgeport Post, The (Bridgeport, Connecticut) - Updated 05/30/2008
Amarillo Globe-Times (Amarillo, Texas) 05/30/2008
Baytown Sun (Baytown, Texas) 05/30/2008
Big Spring Daily Herald (Big Spring, Texas) 05/30/2008
Big Spring Weekly Herald (Big Spring, Texas) 05/30/2008
Brownsville Herald (Brownsville, Texas) 05/30/2008
Corpus Christi Times (Corpus Christi, Texas) 05/30/2008
Deer Park Progress (Deer Park, Texas) 05/30/2008
Denton Record-Chronicle (Denton, Texas) 05/30/2008
Evening Light (San Antonio, Texas) 05/30/2008
Express-News (San Antonio, Texas) 05/30/2008
Galveston Daily News (Galveston, Texas) 05/30/2008
Herald Banner (Greenville, Texas) 05/30/2008
San Antonio Evening News (San Antonio, Texas) 05/30/2008
San Antonio Gazette (San Antonio, Texas) 05/30/2008
San Antonio Light (San Antonio, Texas) 05/30/2008
San Jacinto News-Times (Shepherd, Texas) 05/30/2008
Victoria Advocate (Victoria, Texas) 05/30/2008
Waco News Tribune (Waco, Texas) 05/30/2008
Daily Express (San Antonio, Texas) 05/30/2008
Anniston Star (Anniston, Alabama) 05/30/2008
Daily Sitka Sentinel (Sitka, Alaska) 05/30/2008
Fairbanks Daily News-Miner (Fairbanks, Alaska) 05/30/2008
Dispatch (Douglas, Arizona) 05/30/2008
Morning Sun (Yuma, Arizona) 05/30/2008
Sun-Advertiser (Yuma, Arizona) 05/30/2008
Tucson Daily Citizen (Tucson, Arizona) 05/30/2008
Tucson Daily News (Tucson, Arizona) 05/30/2008
Yuma Daily Sun And Arizona Sentinel (Yuma, Arizona) 05/30/2008
Yuma Examiner (Yuma, Arizona) 05/30/2008
Yuma Weekly Sun (Yuma, Arizona) 05/30/2008
Daily Review (Hayward, California) 05/30/2008
Eureka Humboldt Standard (Eureka, California) 05/30/2008
Independent (Long Beach, California) 05/30/2008
Independent Press-Telegram (Long Beach, California) 05/30/2008
Independent Star News (Pasadena, California) 05/30/2008
Modesto Bee And Herald-News (Modesto, California) 05/30/2008
Modesto News-Herald (Modesto, California) 05/30/2008
Pasadena Independent (Pasadena, California) 05/30/2008
Pasadena Independent Topic (Pasadena, California) 05/30/2008
Post (San Mateo, California) 05/30/2008
Press-Courier (Oxnard, California) 05/30/2008
Press-Telegram (Long Beach, California) 05/30/2008
San Mateo Times And Daily News Leader (San Mateo, California) 05/30/2008
Saturday Oakland Tribune (Oakland, California) 05/30/2008
Star-News (Pasadena, California) 05/30/2008
Sunday Oakland Tribune (Oakland, California) 05/30/2008
Times (San Mateo, California) 05/30/2008
Times Standard (Eureka, California) 05/30/2008
Greeley Daily Tribune (Greeley, Colorado) 05/30/2008
Idaho State Journal (Pocatello, Idaho) 05/30/2008
Post-Register (Idaho Falls, Idaho) 05/30/2008
Austin News (Chicago, Illinois) 05/30/2008
Chicago Heights Star (Chicago, Illinois) 05/30/2008
Daily Leader (Pontiac, Illinois) 05/30/2008
Englewood Economist (Chicago, Illinois) 05/30/2008
Southeast Economist (Chicago, Illinois) 05/30/2008
Southern Illinoisan (Carbondale, Illinois) 05/30/2008
Star Publications (Chicago, Illinois) 05/30/2008
Anderson Daily Bulletin (Anderson, Indiana) 05/30/2008
Cambridge City Tribune (Cambridge City, Indiana) 05/30/2008
Delaware County Daily Times (Chester, Indiana) 05/30/2008
Kokomo Morning Times (Kokomo, Indiana) 05/30/2008
Logansport Daily Tribune (Logansport, Indiana) 05/30/2008
Logansport Journal-Tribune (Logansport, Indiana) 05/30/2008
Logansport Morning Press (Logansport, Indiana) 05/30/2008
Logansport Pharos Tribune (Logansport, Indiana) 05/30/2008
Logansport Pharos-Reporter (Logansport, Indiana) 05/30/2008
National Road Traveler (Cambridge City, Indiana) 05/30/2008
Ames Daily Tribune and Evening Times (Ames, Iowa) 05/30/2008
Bayard Advocate (Bayard, Iowa) 05/30/2008
Bayard News (Bayard, Iowa) 05/30/2008
Cedar Falls Gazette (Cedar Falls, Iowa) 05/30/2008
Salina Journal (Salina, Kansas) 05/30/2008
Corbin Daily Tribune (Corbin, Kentucky) 05/30/2008
Corbin Times (Corbin, Kentucky) 05/30/2008
Corbin Times Tribune (Corbin, Kentucky) 05/30/2008
Middlesboro Daily News (Middlesboro, Kentucky) 05/30/2008
Cumberland Evening Times (Cumberland, Maryland) 05/30/2008
Cumberland News (Cumberland, Maryland) 05/30/2008
Daily Mail (Hagerstown, Maryland) 05/30/2008
Morning Herald (Hagerstown, Maryland) 05/30/2008
The Capital (Annapolis, Maryland) - Updated 05/30/2008
Torch Light And Public Advertiser (Hagers-Town, Maryland) 05/30/2008
Bessemer Herald (Bessemer, Michigan) 05/30/2008
Herald-Palladium (Benton Harbor, Michigan) 05/30/2008
News-Palladium (Benton Harbor, Michigan) 05/30/2008
Pick and Axe (Bessemer, Michigan) 05/30/2008
Traverse City Record Eagle (Traverse City, Michigan) 05/30/2008
Wakefield Advocate (Wakefield, Michigan) 05/30/2008
Wakefield News (Wakefield, Michigan) 05/30/2008
Austin Daily Herald (Austin, Minnesota) 05/30/2008
Daily Journal (Fergus Falls, Minnesota) 05/30/2008
Pioneer (Bemidji, Minnesota) 05/30/2008
Winona Daily News (Winona, Minnesota) 05/30/2008
Winona Republican-Herald (Winona, Minnesota) 05/30/2008
Daily Democrat (Greenville, Mississippi) 05/30/2008
Delta Democrat Times (Greenville, Mississippi) 05/30/2008
Delta Star (Greenville, Mississippi) 05/30/2008
Weekly Democrat-Times (Greenville, Mississippi) 05/30/2008
Daily Capital News (Jefferson City, Missouri) 05/30/2008
Jefferson City Post-Tribune (Jefferson City, Missouri) 05/30/2008
Magic City Free Press (Moberly, Missouri) 05/30/2008
Moberly Monitor-Index (Moberly, Missouri) 05/30/2008
Moberly Weekly Monitor (Moberly, Missouri) 05/30/2008
News and Tribune (Jefferson City, Missouri) 05/30/2008
Billings Gazette (Billings, Montana) 05/30/2008
Daily Inter Lake (Kalispell, Montana) 05/30/2008
Herald (Billings, Montana) 05/30/2008
Montana Standard (Butte, Montana) - Updated 05/30/2008
Montana Standard-Post (Butte-Anaconda, Montana) 05/30/2008
The Anaconda Standard (Anaconda, Montana) - Updated 05/30/2008
Columbus Telegram (Columbus, Nebraska) 05/30/2008
Albuquerque Morning Journal (Albuquerque, New Mexico) 05/30/2008
Albuquerque Tribune (Albuquerque, New Mexico) 05/30/2008
Gallup Independent (Gallup, New Mexico) 05/30/2008
Hobbs Daily News-Sun (Hobbs, New Mexico) 05/30/2008
Las Cruces Sun-News (Las Cruces, New Mexico) 05/30/2008
Las Vegas Optic (Las Vegas, New Mexico) 05/30/2008
Rio Grande Republic (Las Cruces, New Mexico) 05/30/2008
Rio Grande Republican (Las Cruces, New Mexico) 05/30/2008
Santa Rosa News (Santa Rosa, New Mexico) 05/30/2008
Silver City Daily Press (Silver City, New Mexico) 05/30/2008
Daily Messenger (Canandaigua, New York) 05/30/2008
Dunkirk Evening Observer (Dunkirk, New York) - Updated 05/30/2008
Evening Tribune (Hornell, New York) 05/30/2008
Evening Tribune-Times (Hornell, New York) 05/30/2008
Kingston Daily Freeman (Kingston, New York) 05/30/2008
Middletown Times Herald (Middletown, New York) 05/30/2008
Norwich Sun (Norwich, New York) 05/30/2008
Olean Evening Herald (Olean, New York) 05/30/2008
Olean Evening Times (Olean, New York) 05/30/2008
Times Herald (Olean, New York) 05/30/2008
Portsmouth Daily Times (Portsmouth, Ohio) 05/30/2008
Richwood Gazette (Richwood, Ohio) 05/30/2008
Union-Liberty Journal (Hamilton, Ohio) 05/30/2008
Xenia Daily Gazette (Xenia, Ohio) 05/30/2008
Lawton Constitution (Lawton, Oklahoma) 05/30/2008
Lawton Morning Press (Lawton, Oklahoma) 05/30/2008
Daily News Standard (Uniontown, Pennsylvania) 05/30/2008
Daily Record (Stroudsburg, Pennsylvania) 05/30/2008
Delaware County Daily Times (Chester, Pennsylvania) 05/30/2008
Delaware County Daily Times (Primos, Pennsylvania) 05/30/2008
Evening Standard (Uniontown, Pennsylvania) 05/30/2008
North Hills News Record (Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania) 05/30/2008
Pocono Record (Stroudsburg, Pennsylvania) 05/30/2008
Simpson's Leader-Times (Kittanning, Pennsylvania) 05/30/2008
Titusville Herald (Titusville, Pennsylvania) 05/30/2008
Newport Journal And Weekly News (Newport, Rhode Island) 05/30/2008
Newport Mercury And Weekly News (Newport, Rhode Island) 05/30/2008
Newport Navalog (Newport, Rhode Island) 05/30/2008
Daily Times News (Burlington, South Carolina) 05/30/2008
Daily Huronite (Huron, South Dakota) 05/30/2008
Daily Plainsman (Huron, South Dakota) 05/30/2008
Dakota Huronite (Huron, South Dakota) 05/30/2008
Evening Huronite (Huron, South Dakota) 05/30/2008
Huronite and Daily Plainsman (Huron, South Dakota) 05/30/2008
Ogden Standard Examiner (Ogden, Utah) 05/30/2008
Bennington Evening Banner (Bennington, Vermont) - Updated 05/30/2008
Danville Register (Danville, Virginia) 05/30/2008
Progress-Index (Petersburg, Virginia) 05/30/2008
Chehalis Bee-Nugget (Chehalis, Washington) 05/30/2008
Daily Chronicle (Centralia, Washington) 05/30/2008
Post-Herald And Register (Beckley, West Virginia) 05/30/2008
Raleigh Register (Beckley, West Virginia) 05/30/2008
New Castle News (New Castle, Pennsylvania) 05/30/2008
Abilene Reporter News (Abilene, Texas) 05/30/2008
Blizzard (Oil City, Pennsylvania) 05/30/2008
Kingsport Times News (Kingsport, Tennessee) 05/30/2008

Monday, June 2, 2008

What is FHCNET?

This is another in a series of encyclopedia-like articles written by the Ancestry Insider. Some serve as extensions to my failing memory while others give me someplace to link to for terms that may not be known by all readers.

FHCNET, pronounced "fish-net," is a message forum for Family History Center directors and others involved in family history center work. The FHCNET message forum is hosted by Yahoo at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FHCNET. The official site description reads

Mailing list for directors and others closely associated with the operation of LDS family history centers. Topics for discussion include staff training, collection development, film/fiche management, equipment maintenance, FamilySearch, and patron services.

The group was founded on 6-Sep-2001 and has 1140 members. The message rate was 90 new messages during the last week of May and has ranged from 316 to 812 messages per month this year.

As can be assumed, participants are members of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, owner of FamilySearch, the Salt Lake Family History Library and local family history centers. Topics and messages are typically heavily laden with content of interest only to members of that church.

Reading messages does not require membership. Membership in the FHCNET group does not require approval. Posting messages previously was open as well, until the group started receiving pornography. Now messages from unknown members are reviewed by the group administrator before posting. Email attachments are not permitted, but should be sent to the administrator for posting in the Files area. Members cannot hide email addresses and are listed in the directory.

Ileen Johnson is the group administrator or list owner. Ileen and her husband, Freeman, have been involved in genealogy and administered family history centers for many years on several continents. Ileen is the former editor of the Geneva Heights Family History Center News, an excellent monthly publication which she made popular as a resource for training family history center staff members. Ileen and Freeman Johnson currently serve as FamilySearch support missionaries.

Yahoo message groups can be joined and messages read at the group website, via email or via RSS. Visit http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FHCNET or use these email addresses:

Post message: FHCNET@yahoogroups.com
Subscribe: FHCNET-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
Unsubscribe: FHCNET-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
List owner: FHCNET-owner@yahoogroups.com

Johnson posts a regular message to the group with further instructions clarifying group use. I find the title of the message confusing: "File - Posting." Maybe this title is a Yahoo Group requirement. Too bad it can't be named something like "FHCNET Policies."

File - Posting

Topics appropriate for discussion include staff training, collection development, film/fiche management, equipment maintenance, FamilySearch, patron services, or anything else to do with management of a family history center.

Please do not submit virus alerts, chain letters, recipes, jokes, or other off-topic material to the list. Don't send copies of copyrighted material. Vulgarity and personal attacks on other list members, leaders, or the Family History Department are also unwelcome.

If someone else violates these rules, please do not send their message back to the list! That only magnifies the problem. Send a private email if you wish, or notify the list owner at FHCNET-owner@yahoogroups.com.

The FHCNET list will accept brief announcements of books and other resource material related to family history center operation. Please do not post prices. Instead, include a link to a URL, a commercial mailing list, or an email address where the complete ordering information can be found. If you are unsure about what to post, send the message to FHCNET-owner@yahoogroups.com. I'll will review it and forward it to the List if appropriate.

Ileen Johnson, list owner FHCNET-owner@yahoogroups.com

Sunday, June 1, 2008

FamilySearch Indexing Tip: Hiding Columns

It really messes me up when a FamilySearch Indexing (FSI) project has two entry columns for the age when the original census only has one. The two entry columns are Age: Years and Age:Months. When the age is specified in years, you're supposed to index it in the years columns and when it is in months, the months column. About every second row I forget and put the gender in the second age column. My rhythm is always thrown off, slowing me down. So what do I do about it? Shush! Don't tell Salt Lake.

I hide the Age:Months column.

"What?!" You ask. "Insider, how can you do that? Won't that throw the balance of the universe off?" In a word: yes. Well, actually it only throws your yin into your yang when you don't enter what you're supposed to in that column. Before I hide the column, I check it.

I click in the first Age:Months box. Then I use the down-arrow to quickly check every row in the batch. If I come across a row with the age in months, I enter it and proceed down the column. In less than a minute I can completely finish the Age:Months column. Only then do I hide it.

To hide a column, right-click on the column heading of that column and in the little popup menu, click on the Hide option. In the illustration below, I've right-clicked Age:Months and will then click on Hide Age:Months.

Click on column heading, then select Hide for the desired column.
Click on column heading, then select Hide for the desired column.

Now as you tab through the document, you'll fly through the columns without stopping dead every time you hit the age columns. This same approach can help with any column that slows you down. Perhaps Place of Birth:Country is not used and causing you problems. Perhaps you'd like to quickly complete the Page Number column and hide it because it slows you down. As long as you finish a column before hiding it, there is no column that can't be hid.

Unhiding a Column

What do you do if you need to change something in a column that you've hid? Unhiding a column is also simple. Right click on any column header. In the illustration below, I right-clicked the heading Age:Years. This time click on Organize Fields....

Click on any column heading, then select Organize Fields... .
Click on any column heading, then select Organize Fields... .

You will see the popup window shown below. Select the column you wish to unhide from the list on the right. In the illustration below, I have selected Age:Months. Then click on the triangle button pointing towards the left. It's the top button between the two lists.

Select the column to unhide and click the triangle pointing left.
Select the column to unhide and click the triangle pointing left.

By default, this will place the column after all the other columns. Stay tuned for a future tip demonstrating how to rearrange the columns. (Hint: Once you've moved the Age:Months field to the left-hand list, select it and click the up button until it appears in its original position between Age:Years and Sex.)

Saturday, May 31, 2008

NFS Update for Memorial Day: No News Was Bad News

"Temple Tuesday" is my favorite day of the week. I look forward to hearing which new temple districts have switched to New FamilySearch (NFS). So this past week was a disappointment when I heard of no new districts coming online. I guess if we're going to give FamilySearch a holiday, Memorial Day is a fitting one. God bless our brave men and women in uniform, federal and local. And God bless the grieving families of our heroes. May Heaven's comfort rest on all who mourn. And may we do our part to remember our dead.

Sorry; it's been almost a week since Memorial Day and I didn't intend on going there. But there you have it.

Having no new districts go online was bad news, but there were plenty of announcements to offset that. Slated for release next week:
   Accra Ghana
   Curitiba Brazil
   São Paulo Brazil
   Vera Cruz México

The following week (10-June-2008) will be:
   Madrid Spain
   Nashville Tennessee
   San Jose Costa Rica

If all the rumors are right,
   Birmingham Alabama follows on 24-June-2008 and
   Newport Beach 8-July-2008. (What? No 4th of July holiday for FamilySearch installation teams?)

These districts received notification that they are about 4 months away, which puts them in September. Registered family history consultants in these districts can start using NFS. Approximate notification dates are shown.

   Columbia River Washington, 24-May-2008
   Denver Colorado (finally!), 29-May-2008
   London England, 29-May-2008
   Louisville Kentucky, 22-May-2008
   St. Paul Minnesota, 22-May-2008

That's the new news. Check the complete chart for a few others.

And Now, the Really Bad News

In the pure rumor and speculation category there was significant bad news. I received my first two reports of the rollout stretching into 2009. The independent nature of the two increases my confidence that they are true. One report concerned a temple district using non-Roman script. I don't know if the delay is because of a particular language translation or the general challenge of which I've previously spoken concerning 16-bit, non-Roman languages.

The other report concerns a temple affected by the IOUS/IOUF problem of which I've also spoken. If that rumor is true, temples in Idaho, Nevada and Utah might not see NFS until 2009!

Remember, this is only a rumor at this point. Stay tuned...

Thursday, May 29, 2008

Genealogists are the new shaman

All American Man, Canyonlands National Park pictograph.I think genealogists are the shaman of our day. Mind you, we haven't assumed every duty of the ancient shaman, but we have assumed many of them. Shaman is both singular and plural and masculine and feminine; I don't want anyone to feel left out.

We are charged with remembering our tribe's forefathers along with their stories and traditions stretching back many generations. To maximize how much their memory could store, ancient shaman used chanting, songs, dance-steps and other memory devices. Today we've displaced these with paper and computer memory, which store larger amounts of information but are not nearly as fun.

We walk with the dead. Ancient shaman used hallucinogens, meditation and trances to converge the world of the dead with the world of the living. We modern shaman rely primarily on research and records as our primary transportation devices. Newspapers and diaries, photographs and manuscripts have made our ancestors come to life before our very eyes. Discovering our ancestors gives us joy and satisfaction not easily explained to others. As it was anciently, the superlative wonder of these experiences is still impossible to describe to non-participants!

We have experiences beyond the physical laws of nature. Anciently these experiences were attributed to magic or spiritualism. Today... Well, today, we're still at a loss to explain these experiences. In this column we've adopted the term serendipity, but don't let the nondescript nature of the word fool you.

In remembering and walking with our dead, we modern shaman—as a group—are still having the experiences that led our predecessors to be regarded as possessors of great magic. In our sterile, scientific modern environment we cherish these rare experiences, sharing them primarily within our guild. They are, perhaps, the strongest link we share with our ancient forerunners.

When it comes down to it, I think ancient shaman were the genealogists of their day.

Newspaper Rock and My Modern Family Collage.

Wednesday, May 28, 2008

Death, Questions and Ancestors

I was saddened to learn today that Emily Wilbur, co-host of the PBS series Questions and Ancestors, lost her spouse this past weekend. You may have heard about it and not realized the connection to the genealogical community or to The Generations Network.

Second Lieutenant John Alley, United States Air Force, was last seen alive in Pensacola, Florida on Friday, 23-May-2008. The following morning at 5 AM his car was found, totaled. Fearing he may have left the scene disoriented, search dogs and volunteers searched throughout the weekend. Early Memorial Day morning a teenager walking the shoreline found his body washed ashore north of the crash site.

JohnEmilyAlley John and and his wife, the former Emily Wilbur, were newlyweds of less than a year (married 14-July-2007). Barely more than a month ago Emily announced on their blog that they were expecting their first child on 24-Oct-2008. Now John has joined his Ancestors and Emily is left with Questions. Why? How can she go on? What could hurt worse? When will the pain end?

Emily, please know that you are not alone. We love you. We pray for you. Among us are those who know something of your sorrow and the horror you are going through. Some of us understand what flight school can do to a guy. Some of us are members of your Church. Some of us are military brats. Some of us have lost spouses in our youth. Some of us are cargo pilots with fighter pilot souls. Some of us have children that have never known their fathers. Some of us still hurt so badly from loss of a loved one that were it not for support of loved ones we would certainly implode into a disheartened, devastated singularity. Some of us live with the black demon of depression. Some of us live with grief and guilt after that demon has taken a loved one. We pray for you, we love you. Please know that you will never, ever, ever be alone, Emily.

On the Help Find my Brother John facebook group the family has posted this statement:

We wish to express appreciation to everyone who has helped us and are helping at this difficult time. The outpouring of love and kindness has been overwhelming. We love John and will dearly miss his amazing spirit, but are grateful for the knowledge of where he’s at and that we’ll see him again.

Our hearts and sympathy go out especially to Emily and her unborn child. We want to preserve the memory of her husband and their child's father through memories and stories of him. If any of you have anything that you can remember of John please post them in the discussion board or send them to all03009@byui.edu. Thank you.

If you feel you want to help Emily and her child out financially, you can donate to a trust fund established in her name. Visit www.helpfindjohn.info for the link.

All sorts of additional details about this story can be found at www.helpfindjohn.info. It may be too soon for Emily to start thinking about life without John. But I hope she decides to continue her work as a professional genealogist. And I hope the genealogical community sends so much work her direction that she can make a living doing it. Read on...

Emily Wilbur Alley

Emily Wilbur AlleyEmily Wilbur Alley is a graduate of Brigham Young University where she earned a degree in Family History and Genealogy. While earning her degree she was employed by the Center for Family History and Genealogy at BYU as a teaching assistant, worked as a research assistant to Dr. George Ryskamp, Center Director, and in 2006 received the center's Young Family Historian of the Year Award. Prior to graduation, Emily interned at the New England Historic Genealogical Society in Boston, Massachusetts and the Family History Library in Salt Lake City, where she continued as a British reference consultant after graduation. She was recipient of two ORCA research scholarships, the first allowing her to conduct personal genealogical research in New England. For the second, she accompanied two professors to the British Isles to study emigration sources in English and Scottish archives. She co-authored a summary of their finds in the Utah Genealogical Association's Genealogical Journal, titled "British Immigrants Project," 31 (2003): 138-140.

Emily worked at Ancestry.com as a genealogist assisting customers with research questions. She is serving on the board of directors for the Utah Genealogical Association (2007-2009). She is an associate at Price and Associates, Inc. and has been doing private client genealogical research (see www.emilywilbur.com).

Emily Wilbur Alley and Darius GrayQuestions and Ancestors is the follow-on series to the popular PBS series Ancestors. Each week co-hosts Emily Wilbur Alley and Darius Gray, along with other family history experts, answer questions submitted by listeners. Look for the series on your local PBS radio or television channel. Listen to episodes or check for scheduled BYU-TV showings online.

(Biographical information:
"
Co-Host Biographies" and "Emily Wilbur.")

Monday, May 26, 2008

Free book AND free military records access

Happy Memorial Day, everyone!

I've previously mentioned that Ancestry.com's military records can be accessed for free through the end of May. Go to www.ancestry.com/military for more information about this military records promotion.

They did it last year and I just noticed they're doing it again this year. One of Juliana's 24/7 Family History Circle Blog Extras posts on Friday mentions the availability of a free book download. Currently, the links in her post are not aimed correctly. Instead, click here to download a free PDF copy of Military Records at Ancestry.com.

The Ancestry Store website contains this information about the book:

[In] Military Records at Ancestry.com...Esther Yu Sumner leads you chronologically through the history of American wars, providing you with a brief contextual and historical basis for each war, then listing a variety of Ancestry.com databases that relate to them. Not intended as an exhaustive historical treatise, Military Records at Ancestry.com is nonetheless a handy little tool for navigating the Military Collection on the #1 family history resource on the Internet.

I found the book mildly useful for its brief synopsis of each of 24 American wars from Jamestown conflicts (1622-44) to the Vietnam War (1954-75) and for the links to military resources on websites other than Ancestry.com. But since the book is a year old, it is no longer a comprehensive list of Ancestry databases for each war. Besides, a subscriber shouldn't have to purchase a book in order to find and use Ancestry's military databases. If the website doesn't make that easy enough as is, the website needs to be fixed.

My book review rating: 4 star general at this price.

Saturday, May 24, 2008

FamilySearch Indexing Hints: Adjusting Highlights

The semimonthly headquarters message for FamilySearch Indexing (FSI) on 16-May-2008 gave some great hints for adjusting highlights. Unfortunately, without illustrations, my brain glazed over and I got little from the message. Here's my version of the message, with illustrations added.

Adjusting Highlights

You've seen projects with highlighting on the document image that shows you what information goes in the current field at the bottom of the page. Sometimes highlights are off for the whole document and little corrections using Ctrl + Alt + an arrow key just won't hack it.

Sometimes the highlights are way off for the whole page.
Sometimes the highlights are way off for the whole page.

To adjust the highlights for the entire page:

  1. First, try each highlight choice from the drop-down list at the top of the page.
    Try each highlight choice to see which is best.
    Try each highlight choice to see which is best.
  2. If that doesn't resolve the problem, switch to Adjust Highlights Mode. Click the View menu and then click Adjust Highlights.
    Click View and then Adjust Highlights.
    Click View and then Adjust Highlights.
  3. You won't notice anything different until you move your mouse pointer over the information you are indexing. A grid of yellow boxes appears within a red border. Each yellow box shows where a highlight will appear. Blue text on each yellow box indicates the field name. You will use the red squares on the four corners of the red border to adjust all the highlights on the page.
  4. Click on the red box on the upper-left corner of the border. While holding the mouse button down, drag the red box around until the yellow boxes line up properly. Pay particular attention to thin columns, such as Age, Sex and Color in the illustration below. Look to see that the first row of highlights is positioned within the first row of the record. When positioned correctly, release the mouse button.
    Position the upper-left corner.
    Position the upper-left corner.
  5. Next reposition the upper-right corner. It doesn't matter if the yellow boxes fit exactly in the columns of the record. What's important is that when you're indexing the highlights will be close enough to the proper row and column so that you can identify the proper data to index.
    Position the upper-right corner.
    Position the upper-right corner.
  6. After the top 2 corners, do the lower-right corner. Look to see that the last row of yellow boxes lines up with the last row of the document. Again, make certain that thin columns line up properly and other columns line up acceptably.
    Position the lower-left corner.
    Position the lower-left corner.
  7. Finally, do the lower-right corner.
    Position the lower-right corner.
    Position the lower-right corner.
  8. To get out of Adjust Highlights Mode, again click View on the menu and then click Adjust Highlights.

And with that, all the highlights should be positioned where they should be. Well, close enough, anyway.

The wrong gender stays in New FamilySearch

The Family: A Proclamation to the World
The Family: A Proclamation to
the World
warns of "calamities
foretold by ancient and modern
prophets." © 1995, IRI.

Members of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (the Church) hold traditional views regarding gender and families. In The Family: A Proclamation to the World, Church leaders teach that "gender is an essential characteristic of individual premortal, mortal, and eternal identity and purpose."

It may come as a surprise, then, that there are sometimes good reasons for records in New FamilySearch to indicate the wrong gender.

There are several articles in the Help Center of New FamilySearch telling patrons how to deal with records containing gender problems:

  • Document ID 102699: new FamilySearch: Combining siblings when one has an unknown gender
  • Document ID 102711: How to combine people who are listed as both male and female or as unknown

  • FAQ ID 284faq0480: What can I do to change an individual's gender?
  • Document ID 102189: I can't add or edit unknown gender on an individual I entered into the new FamilySearch
  • Document ID 101995: new FamilySearch: How to change an incorrect gender
  • Document ID 103267: Same child shows up twice or more in the same family, once with the wrong gender

Briefly, as is generally the case in New FamilySearch (NFS), you can correct information you contribute, you can ask other contributors to correct mistakes when contact information is available, you can dispute incorrect information and you can create new records with proper information where none yet exists. Unlike other information in NFS, FamilySearch Support solicits requests to correct the gender (see doc. ID 101995). Perhaps this exception reflects the Church's desire to remove entries from temple records for work done under the wrong gender.

It was presumably in response to such a request that Terry Mason received an interesting response from Support that is, as of yet, not reflected in the FamilySearch Help Center.

The record for _______ showing the incorrect gender was submitted by more than one individual, including a submission for temple ordinance work. This ordinance work is invalid but in order to prevent anyone else from submitting the name with the wrong gender and duplicating the ordinance work, the incorrect record will remain in New FamilySearch. By adding a dispute to the record with the incorrect gender it indicates to others that the information is wrong. We hope this explanation will help you understand the reason the records with the incorrect gender will remain in New FamilySearch.

For those hoping to make New FamilySearch a perfect reflection of reality, this policy may appear to be an unpleasant mistake. But, in fact, this too is a general policy concerning incorrect information. Where careful researchers are aware of widespread misinformation, they may wish to proactively enter such information into New FamilySearch and dispute their own contribution, giving evidence that the information is incorrect and directing others to the correct information.

It's counter-intuitive, but keeping wrong information in New FamilySearch can be the right thing to do.

Friday, May 23, 2008

Solving the NFS problem of incorrectly combined records

Several weeks ago Dave Merrill made a post on FHCNET (pronounced "fish-net," a message forum for Family History Center directors and "staff"). I think his posting was spot on, so I am reproducing it here with his permission. I have made minor edits and added some text to improve flow, mostly to match the editorial style of this blog. To see his original post, click on Reduce incorrect combining of separated records.

After several months of using New FamilySearch (NFS), several problems with the current system have emerged.

  • Infinite loops exist where fathers are combined with sons of the same name, etc.
  • Patrons have spent hours or even days correcting a folder containing hundreds of records of multiple people only to have someone come along afterwards and incorrectly re-combine the records.
  • Twins with similar names have been repeatedly combined.
  • Children have died and the next child given the same name, then the records combined.

All these problems result from the incorrect combining of separate records. Many patrons have stated they will wait until these problems have a solution before attempting to separate or correct large folders [where a "folder" is the combined collection of all the records about a person].

The solution I propose has these advantages:

  • Existing technology similar to the edit process can be used.
  • It encourages documentation and collaboration between patrons.
  • The burden is placed on the patrons.

Here's the solution I'm proposing:

  • Add a link in the Summary/Detail view next to `Combined Records' named `Separated Records'.
  • Let anyone combine or separate a record that has never been combined or separated before.
  • When a record is separated open a box and allow/encourage the person to document or comment on the separation.
  • Track each separated record, who separated it and the documentation or comments given.
  • Allow only the person who separated the record (and nFS support) to re-combine the records.
  • When a patron tries to combine records that were previously separated, do all of the following:
  • Open a new window with the message: "This record was previously separated by [name and contact info] based upon [documentation or comment]. To have the record re-combined please contact this person."
  • Allow the separation to be disputed.
  • Tell the patron how to appeal irreconcilable disputes to NFS support.
  • Should the patron have conflicting documentation, suggest the patron create a new folder/person with the desired facts and events. Then combine the disputed record with the new folder/person.

Thank you Dave Merrill. This is well thought out and I think it is an elegant solution to what is emerging to be an ugly problem. If you don't mind, I will re-iterate your suggestion to anyone I can get to listen at FamilySearch.

Thursday, May 22, 2008

Troubleshooting the Ancestry Image Viewer

There have been a rash of people that started having problems with the Ancestry Enhanced Image Viewer out of the blue about a month ago. One night from one search result to the next it just stopped working on me. Everytime I tried to view an image, Ancestry.com got caught in an endless loop trying to install the viewer, even though it was already installed. Deleting my Ancestry cookies quickly solved the problem for me.

I need to ask around at work and see if the exact cause(s) has been identified. But today I noticed the Help system has a new article titled, Troubleshooting the Enhanced Image Viewer. If deleting your cookies doesn't solve your recently-surfaced viewer problems, try the different methods described in this group of articles.

If for some reason that link doesn't work, here's a posting on the Ancestry message boards giving detailed instructions on how to manually de-install and reinstall the viewer.

Ancestry Site Comments - Family History & Genealogy Message Board - Ancestry.com

Wednesday, May 21, 2008

RootsWeb Adds Project Banners Today

The day has arrived for the addition of headers to RootsWeb hosted genealogy project websites such as World GenWeb, FreeBMD, etc. RootsWeb Community Operations Manager, Anna, posted this message today:

As planned, the updated mastheads will start appearing later today. We receive a lot of positive feedback on the content of your sites and are proud to be able to be a small part of your success.

If you would like to change the masthead on your site from the new default gray color to the green masthead please follow the instructions below.

To see the complete post, including the instructions for choosing the alternate header, click on RootsWeb Newsroom » Blog Archive » New Mastheads - Look for them today….

As of the time this message was posted, headers had not appeared on any of the sites I checked, including:

  • Is the USGenWeb domain still hosted by RootsWeb or did they move elsewhere?
  • The USGenWeb Digital Maps website still sports a "hosted by RootsWeb" graphic.
  • UTGenWeb - State of Utah portion of USGenWeb.
  • WorldGenWeb - "Root" GenWeb site for the entire world.
  • FreeBMD - Project to transcribe birth, marriage, death civil registration index for England & Wales.
  • Is Cyndi's List still hosted by RootsWeb? Will headers be added to this venerable website?

Many USGenWeb project coordinators received a message earlier this month from David Graham, Sr. Product Manager at RootsWeb.com. The full text of the letter was posted on various message boards:

Dear USGenWeb coordinators,

For those of you with pages hosted on RootsWeb.com we wanted to give you an update on our plan for including a small masthead at the top of hosted pages on RootsWeb. We love being able to host your page and other pages that help the family history community so much, and adding this small masthead to acknowledge our hosting service allows us to continue to be able to offer this free hosting service as well as other services.

The mastheads will be included on pages as early as May 21st. The standard masthead can be viewed here:

http://www.rootsweb.ancestry.com/rootsweb/samples_mastheads/masthead_General.jpg

As a USGenWeb coordinator you will also have the option to use a USGenWeb specific masthead. It can be viewed here:

http://www.rootsweb.ancestry.com/rootsweb/samples_mastheads/masthead_USGenWeb.jpg

To get the USGenWeb masthead on your page instead of the standard one all you need to do is place a file named 'banner_select' in your public_html directory. It should contain the text 'USGENWEB' (all caps and without the quotation marks) and nothing else.

Thanks for your support on this minor change. We love hosting your page and this allows us to continue to offer this free hosting service.

On another note, we also wanted to let you know that in the coming months we will be releasing a new feature that will make it easier for you to make sure that other people can find your page on RootsWeb. It will let you enter some information about your page to get it included in a new search feature built to find pages hosted on RootsWeb. For hosted pages related to the USGenWeb Project, we will also create a specialized page that will surface all of the pages that are associated with the project. We hope to be able to link to this listing of hosted USGenWeb pages from the RootsWeb homepage. As this project comes closer to completion we will let you know more about it.

Thanks,

DAVID GRAHAM
Sr. Product Manager RootsWeb.com
Part of The Generations Network

The original announcement that mastheads would be added to these websites was made last August and can be found at Update on mastheads.

Tuesday, May 20, 2008

Are Incomplete Databases Ancestry's Policy?

Ancestry Insider reader, Mike, posted a question recently and I thought you might all like to hear the answer.

I have a question about a comment you made where you said, "Ancestry's practice is to release at least one database every workday". Obviously that is a marketing driven thing, but my question is how significant it really is. That is, is a brand new database released every day, or do "updated" databases count too? And if the answer to that question is yes, then as a marketing scheme, is it Ancestry's policy to intentionally release incomplete databases so as to be able to tout updates?

Don't misunderstand me.

While it's Ancestry's practice to release a new database everyday, it's not a policy, to my knowledge. I've never seen Ancestry claim they do so. I wouldn't be shocked if they've missed one or more days. I wouldn't be surprised if there are high ranking managers that don't know that it occurs. It just happens. Call it corporate memory. Call it bureaucracy. Call it a legacy, maybe even a tribute, to Paul Allen. It survives as a practice of a former policy.

The practice, as I've observed it, is to release a new database each business day. (Take a look at my list for the last 60 days and let me know if I'm wrong.) When you release thousands of new databases each year, it's not difficult to schedule 250 of them to cover each business day of the year.

Why Does Ancestry Release Incomplete Databases?

It is almost always more expensive when Ancestry posts a database piecemeal. So if Ancestry doesn't need to release incomplete databases so it can tout updates, why update databases or release incomplete databases? There are several situations where databases are updated or incomplete databases are released:

  • Additional records regularly become available. This is the case for the SSDI and can happen for vital records where states annually release records of a legislated age.
  • Additional records become available from the original data source. For example, a national archive microfilms additional records in a series. I believe last week's update to California Passenger and Crew Lists, 1893-1957 is an example of this happening.
  • An important database is so large that it will take weeks, months or even years to complete. A U.S. Federal census is an example. The 30-April update of the U.S. School Yearbooks is an example.
  • Portions of a database are coming from different sources. In the case of state censuses, this might happen when different years and counties are coming from individual counties, multiple university libraries or private vs. public historical organization.
  • Source media for a database are entering Ancestry's digital factory at widely spaced times. This might happen when Ancestry places a large microfilm order that overwhelms an institution's capacity to speedily duplicate all the films ordered. This can also happen when problems in Ancestry's production process cause part of a job to be sent back for rework at an earlier factory stage.
  • Ancestry feels that posting the images for a database before the creation of an index gives the customer enough value to warrant the extra costs. The Canadian Drouin Collection is an example where this occurred.
  • Ancestry is performing maintenance (fixing problems) in a database. I'm guessing that was the situation with the 30-April update of the 1851 and 1871 England Censuses.
  • Ancestry is combining 2 or more closely related databases. If I recall correctly, an example is the
  • Florida Marriage Collection, 1822-1875 and 1927-2001, which is a combination of a database for 1822-1875 and a database for 1927-2001.

Databases can remain incomplete when:

  • Historical records have been lost. If you scroll down to the bottom of the 1790 Census, database page and select "Click Here", you'll see that the returns for two states have been lost! Many censuses taken by individual states have been lost as well.
  • Agreements can't be reached with some of the record custodians.
  • Production costs are too great for a portion of a record set. For example, some of the records might be index cards that can be scanned with auto-feed scanners while another part is a solid clump of water-damaged, irregular sized manuscripts.

As you can see, there are many reasons why Ancestry releases incomplete databases or updates databases. Rest assured that tricking you is not one of them.

Monday, May 19, 2008

NFS Update: The World Distorted

While its been a month since I've updated my rollout map, I've not been idle. Today I rollout a new map showing temples of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints across the entire world.

New FamilySearch Rollout Map for 17-May-2008

You'll immediately notice several changes:

  • The map is bigger, allowing coverage of the entire world.
  • The changes for the past week are blinking, showing the changed status for these temples.
  • I'M SORRY! Please don't be offended. The world is distorted! To minimize the work, I kept North America the same size as on the old map. To minimize the size, I shrunk other continents and rearranged them. In a sense, I was striving for constant temple dot density. I hate what happened to the Bering Strait. Well, all East Asia and the Philippines, actually. But compromises had to be made. I ran out of steam and my source map was icky. Apologies to Alaska, Камча́тский and Чуко́тка. Maybe some day I'll build up the gumption to fix this.

Changes since the last update:

  • On 6-May-2008 New FamilySearch (NFS) came to the final 3 temples in Australia, making Australia the first continent to complete the transition to NFS! That day South America got its 2nd temple as Brazil got its first. I think that was also the first week where NFS rolled out to 4 temples.
  • The next week, Houston and Lubbock finished off Texas. Of all completed states, Texas with its 4 takes the top spot in number of temples. California has one more temple on NFS, but is 2 shy of being complete. Also on 13-May, Porto Alegre Brazil was activated. Brazil is the only South American nation with more than one temple.
  • This week is supposed to be another 4 temple week. Columbia is the 4th temple for South America. Halifax is Canada's 2nd. The other 2 are Chicago and Manhattan.
  • I've added a release date for Birmingham (24-June-2008).
  • Columbia South Carolina and Edmonton Canada received their 3 or 4 month notifications.
  • In the rumor category, we've heard Spokane might be June. The latest rumored date for Hong Kong is "maybe December."

Let me know if you like the new map. (However, if you don't like it, don't let me know. ;-) Also let me know if I've made any mistakes regarding temple locations or status. And definitely let me know if you've received your 3 or 4 month notification or your go-live date. AncestryInsider@gmail.com

As always, the latest news is always available at Temple Districts Using New FamilySearch.

Saturday, May 17, 2008

New Databases at Ancestry.com

Website Update

If you happen upon any sawdust or tools left out, you'll have to excuse me. I've been doing a little work on the website. The most significant change is wider columns. (If you read my blog via e-mail subscription or feed reader, you won't notice any changes.) The wider columns give me more freedom when including tables, videos, maps and images. If the columns are too wide for your computer, read Website Too Wide?.

New Databases @ Ancestry.com

I've added two items to the website sidebar. "About Me" is my profile, complete with Simpsonized picture.

The other is a mashup titled "Recent Databases." A copy is shown to the right. The concept of mashups is fascinating and this is an excellent example. I'll write about mashups sometime and explain how mashups work and this mashup does in particular.

Anyway, the Recent Databases mashup is a cool little widget that displays a list of the recently released or updated genealogy databases at Ancestry.com. Visit the Ancestry Insider once each day to see that day's new database. Ancestry's practice is to release at least one database every workday. In this way you'll often learn of new databases before they're announced on the Ancestry blogs.

To see databases after the two shown, click the down arrow on the scroll bar. Click anywhere on the scrollbar to immediately jump to that place in the list. The list goes back about 60 days.

Click on the underlined title to open a window for that database on Ancestry.com. The Post Date (month/day/year) is when the database was released, if new, or the date it was updated. For example, scroll down to Social Security Death Index and look at the post date. This is not the original release date, but the last update date. You can differentiate between new and updated entries by looking at the Title and notations where the title is duplicated plus the addition of any notations such as "Updated", "Free Index", "(in Italian)", etc.

A nice thing about widgets is their reusability. You can add this widget to your own blog, website or MySpace profile if you desire. Please don't remove the link to ancestryinsider.blogspot.com! Underneath the widget click on "Add to your site." Copy the small, gray code inside the box and paste it according to the instructions for your blog or site.

If you can't see the widget in your e-mail or feed reader, come to the website.

Enjoy and stay tuned...