2010 photograph of NARA Digitization Project Manager, Erin Townsend,
viewing newly digitized and published records on Ancestry.com.
Image credit: NARA.
Embargos are already starting to expire on early partnership projects. According to NARA, they have published 5.25 million images on their website. NARA uses a different paradigm than other companies for publishing online record collections. If I understand correctly, records must be accessed through their catalog.
Digitizing originals can be quite expensive, so Ancestry, and by extension all you Ancestry subscribers, are to be applauded. You’re making a difference. “With investments in scanning and indexing reaching more than 1 billion records, we have saved taxpayers more than $100 million dollars at commercial digitization rates,” said Matthew. If my math is correct, that means it would cost NARA $10 to scan and index each record. (Wow! If that is the case, FamilySearch is underpaying its indexers. Oh, wait… Never mind.)
The renewal comes despite an incident in March. An Ancestry employee was caught throwing away NARA documents rather than digitizing them. (See “NARA Suspends Ancestry.com Scanning Operation” on my blog.) I’ve never seen any other public information on the incident. Obviously, if NARA has renewed the agreement, Ancestry must have cured any weaknesses in their processes.
Ancestry began digitizing NARA microfilm back in 2000. They began scanning original paper documents in 2008. In that time they have published 1,371 collections from NARA collections, containing over 170 million images and more than 1 billion records.
“This agreement marks the renewing of a great partnership and we are proud to continue our relationship with the United States National Archives and Record Administration,” Matthew said.
Partnerships are a key part of NARA’s digitization plan. More than 97% of the documents scanned at NARA are done by partners. It appears genealogy companies are doing the lions’ share of that. That mirrors user requests. NARA recently asked what people wanted digitized the most. “Overwhelmingly, people asked us to digitize records of genealogical interest,” said NARA’s Denise M. Henderson. “[Requests] include… immigration and ethnic heritage records; [and] military and veterans records, especially those from World War I and II.”
Among the records NARA will focus on (not necessary via Ancestry) for the next 18-24 months are:
Record Group Title 21 All Naturalization Records 21 Bankruptcy Dockets (within certain parameters) 26/36 Seamen Records / Crew Lists 24 Naval Muster Rolls 24 Logbooks of U.S. Navy Ships, 1801-1940 24 Logbooks of U.S. Navy Ships and Stations, 1941-1978 24 Bureau of Naval Personnel Casualty Case Cards, 1964-1977 129 Inmate Case Files (Leavenworth) – first 10,000 case files only 226 Office of Strategic Services Personnel Files, 1942-1945 59 Department of State Name Index, 1910-1959 59 Department of State Central Decimal Files, 1910-1929 15 Case Files of Disapproved Pension Applications of Veterans of the Army and the Navy Who Served Mainly in the Civil War and the War with Spain, 1861-1934 15 Case Files of Disapproved Pension Applications of Widows and Other Dependents of Veterans of the Army and Navy, 1861-1934 109 Record Books of Executive, Legislative, and Judicial Offices of the Confederate Government, 1874-1899 498 Helper Files, ca. 1945 – 1947 – 19 series/multiple countries 407 World War II Operations Reports, 1940-1948 29 1950 Census Enumeration District Maps